Scotus argues that the will's self-motion (as an active power originating its own act) is irreducible to any intellectual operation, establishing an asymmetry of causal kind, not merely act.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Active power(describing the will's nature): A capacity or ability to do something or make something happen, as opposed to just passively receiving change from outside.
Asymmetry of causal kind(describing the difference between will and intellect): A situation where two things work in different fundamental ways—not just in degree or strength, but in their basic nature or type.
Intellectual operation(what the will is being contrasted with): Mental activities involving reasoning, thinking, or processing information with the mind's rational faculty.
Originating its own act(describing what the will's power does): Being the source or starting point of an action, rather than having that action caused by something else.
Scotus(The philosopher whose reasoning is being analyzed): A medieval philosopher (John Duns Scotus, 1266-1308) known for his detailed logical arguments about God, free will, and how things exist.
irreducible(Personalist anthropology; distinguishes personhood from mere biological individuality): That which is unique and unrepeatable in each human being, by virtue of which a person is not merely an individual of a species but a personal subject.
self-motion(Used by Scotus to describe both volitional action and certain physical processes such as free fall): Motion or action caused by the moving or acting thing itself, rather than by an external determinant or end

2 topics