Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Scripture argues that the payment of sin is finished with death
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Matthew 25:31-46 and Revelation 20:11-15 describe post-mortem judgment and separation, suggesting accountability continues beyond death.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hebrews 9:27 says judgment follows death, not that death concludes judgment, indicating further reckoning is necessary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Numerous passages reference eternal consequences (Matthew 25:46, Mark 9:47-48), implying sin's payment extends beyond physical death.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Romans 6:23 states 'the wages of sin is death,' establishing death as sin's direct consequence and payment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hebrews 9:27 affirms 'people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,' treating death as the final reckoning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
1 Corinthians 15:55-57 presents death's defeat through Christ as victory, implying death previously held legitimate claim over sin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.