Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Scrutinizing assumptions about Revelation leaves intact the core intuition that dispositional properties cannot fully capture phenomenal redness.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Scrutinizing assumptions about Revelation may undermine the intuition itself, not preserve it—introspection is unreliable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Modern dispositional accounts can incorporate phenomenal character without abandoning dispositional frameworks entirely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The intuition that phenomenal redness exceeds dispositions may reflect conceptual confusion rather than metaphysical insight.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Phenomenal redness has intrinsic qualitative character that seems independent of how objects dispose us to respond.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Dispositional accounts struggle to explain why redness feels the way it does rather than some other way entirely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Revelatory experiences of color seem to disclose non-relational properties that dispositionalism cannot accommodate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.