Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Second-order logic satisfies strong κ-compactness when ev... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The least κ such that second-order logic satisfies strong κ-compactness is the least extendible cardinal.

    Second-order logic satisfies strong κ-compactness when every second-order theory, every subset of size less than κ of which has a model, has itself a model.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Magidor (1971) established that the threshold compactness cardinal for second-or...The least κ such that second-order logic satisfies strong κ-compactness is the l...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The least κ such that second-order logic satisfies strong κ-compactnes...86%Magidor (1971) established that the threshold compactness cardinal for...82%The compactness theorem for sets of first-order sentences states that ...81%Completeness and compactness fail for every higher-order logic with st...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-higher-order
    View source passageHide passage
    The only difference is that one has to start with a big model, a model of the size of a measurable cardinal. Smaller cardinals need not work. For example, if \(\lambda\) is the least weakly compact cardinal \(>\omega\), then there is a sentence \(\phi\) which has \(\lambda\) (with the empty vocabulary) as a model but no smaller models. The sentence[10] \(\phi\) says that \(\lambda\) is inaccessible (\(>\omega\)) and that every \(\lambda\)-tree (a tree of height \(\lambda\) with all level

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective