Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Segmented choice in agreement models can produce outcomes... — Carmelics
    Home/Social Contract
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Segmented choice in contractualist models of agreement can produce outcomes that are not rationalizable to the contracting parties

    Segmented choice in agreement models can produce outcomes that are the result of path-dependent processes

    Social Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Social Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Outcomes resulting from path-dependent processes may not be rationalizable to th...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Social Contract
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Segmented choice in contractualist models of agreement can produce outcomes that...

    Similar

    Segmented choice in contractualist models of agreement can produce out...79%Outcomes resulting from path-dependent processes may not be rationaliz...74%Contractualism evaluates agreements by whether they can be reasonably ...72%Individuals are more likely to comply with agreements they participate...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractarianism-contemporary
    View source passageHide passage
    This argument has been revived by Jussi Suikkanen (2014) as the claim that certain forms of contract theory, most notably Southwood’s (2010) “deliberative” contractualism, commit the conditional fallacy. The conditional fallacy is a specific version of the problem we are considering here, namely that a conditional with counterfactual agents, will not necessarily apply if the counterfactual agents are sufficiently different from the real ones it is meant to apply to. In response, Southwood (2019)

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective