Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Self-illumination of witnessing consciousness accounts fo... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Witnessing consciousness is self-illuminating and does not require a second cognition to be known

    Self-illumination of witnessing consciousness accounts for the immediacy of cognition without requiring higher-order cognitions

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A vicious infinite regress is unacceptable as an explanation of cognitionAn infinite regress of cognitions would mean no perception could ever be knownIf a primary cognition requires a second apperceptive cognition to be known, the...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Witnessing consciousness is self-illuminating and does not require a second cogn...

    Similar

    Witnessing consciousness is self-illuminating and does not require a s...86%Change blindness does not show that there is no consciousness in the a...81%When consciousness has no objects to illumine, no intentional experien...80%All means of knowledge presuppose consciousness as their illuminating ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: shankara
    View source passageHide passage
    Śaṅkara repudiates rival philosophies such as the Nyāya school which rejects witnessing consciousness and self-illumination in favor of other-illumination (paraprakāśa)—a thesis more akin to contemporary higher order theories. Nyāya argues that a second cognition is required to illumine the first. Śaṅkara’s basic counter-critique is that if a primary cognition requires a second apperceptive cognition to be known, then the second would require a third, etc., leading to a vicious infinite regressi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective