Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Self-ownership does not necessarily entail the strong exc... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Self-ownership does not necessarily entail the strong exclusive property rights Nozick claims.

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The argument from self-ownership to exclusive property rights has not been shown to be the only compatible derivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Alternative conceptions of self-ownership may be consistent with weaker or different property rights.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & Liberty

    Related

    Alternative conceptions of self-ownership may be consistent with weaker or diffe...The argument from self-ownership to exclusive property rights has not been shown...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Similar

    The argument from self-ownership to exclusive property rights has not ...88%Property rights are exclusive, meaning others are prohibited from inte...86%Alternative conceptions of self-ownership may be consistent with weake...84%Self-ownership can be understood as importantly analogous to ownership...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: justice-distributive
    View source passageHide passage
    As already noted, Nozick argues that because people own themselves and hence their talents, they own whatever they can produce with these talents. Moreover, it is possible in a free market to sell the products of exercising one’s talents. Any taxation of the income from such selling, according to Nozick, ‘institute[s] (partial) ownership by others of people and their actions and labor’ (Nozick, p. 172). People, according to this argument, have these exclusive rights of ownership. Taxation then,
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit