Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Sensa arise from a confusion between a perception (which ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Sensa do not really exist; they only create the illusion of existence

    Sensa arise from a confusion between a perception (which is part of the percipient and therefore mental or spiritual) and the object of that perception (the perceptum)

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A perceptum as a sensum cannot have parts within parts to infinitySensa do not really exist; they only create the illusion of existenceWhat genuinely exists has no simple parts, and sensa fail this condition

    Similar

    Ordinary perception typically requires the perceived thing to be an ob...80%Principle 1's definition of perception is too broad, because it entail...79%Principle 1 defines perception in terms of production by sensory conne...79%Principle 1's definition of perception is inadequate because it exclud...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    The existence of matter can also not be inferred on the basis of the prima facie existence of what I perceive “by means of the sense organs of our bodies”, i.e., of what he calls “sensa” (NE §373), because it is erroneous to believe that matter as the presumed outside cause of a sensum has the same qualities as a sensum and thus has to exist (NE §365). He conjectures that if there are outside causes of sensa they must be substances which are “of a spiritual nature” (NE §371). When it comes to (c

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective