Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Sense-data may be relational entities constituted by both the perceiver and the environment, as argued by Price in 'Perception' (1932).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If sense-data require perceiver constitution, their existence becomes dependent on consciousness, making objective error and hallucination metaphysically mysterious.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Relational constitution conflates epistemological dependence (knowledge requires perceiver) with ontological dependence (being requires perceiver), committing a category error.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Environmental properties sufficiently explain perceptual variance through differential stimulation; positing perceiver constitution adds explanatory entities without necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Perceptual experience varies systematically based on observer conditions (perspective, sensory capacity, attention), suggesting constitutive perceiver involvement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Environmental properties alone cannot determine quale qualities; identical stimuli produce different experiences across observers, indicating relational constitution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Sense-data exhibit properties of neither pure mind nor pure matter, making relational constitution a coherent metaphysical framework for their ontological status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.