Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Sexual objectification cannot serve as the common definin... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Sexual objectification cannot serve as the common defining condition of womanhood.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.MacKinnon claims that sexual objectification is the common condition that defines women's gender.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The form of sexual objectification women experience varies considerably depending on race and class.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.During slavery, Black women were hypersexualised and presumed always sexually available, while white women were regarded as pure and sexually virtuous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Moral ResponsibilityPersonal Identity

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment2 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    A condition that varies substantially across groups of women cannot serve as the...During slavery, Black women were hypersexualised and presumed always sexually av...MacKinnon claims that sexual objectification is the common condition that define...The form of sexual objectification women experience varies considerably dependin...
    +1 moreShow less
    The rape of a Black woman was considered legally and socially impossible under t...

    Similar

    MacKinnon claims that sexual objectification is the common condition t...86%A condition that varies substantially across groups of women cannot se...81%The form of sexual objectification women experience varies considerabl...79%Some alienation has no connection to objectification78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: feminism-gender
    View source passageHide passage
    Elizabeth Spelman (1988) has influentially argued against gender realism with her particularity argument. Roughly: gender realists mistakenly assume that gender is constructed independently of race, class, ethnicity and nationality. If gender were separable from, for example, race and class in this manner, all women would experience womanhood in the same way. And this is clearly false. For instance, Harris (1993) and Stone (2007) criticise MacKinnon’s view, that sexual objectification is the com
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit