Sharing a variable 'x' across two existential quantifiers in separate conjuncts creates a misleading syntactic appearance of a linked ranging, which Prior warned distorts logical form.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Conjuncts(the three separate conditions being listed in this analysis): Individual parts or conditions that are joined together; think of them as separate claims connected by 'and'.
Linked ranging(in formal logic): A situation where a variable appears to connect multiple parts of a statement, making them seem more related than they actually are logically.
Prior, Arthur N.(in modern logic and philosophy): A 20th-century philosopher and logician known for studying how the way statements are written can hide or reveal their true logical meaning.
Syntactic appearance(in logic and linguistics): How something looks or is written on the surface, as opposed to what it actually means underneath.
Variable(as used in logic and causation): Something that can change or have different values—like temperature, height, or whether a light is on or off.
existential quantifier(Philosophy of logic; debate over ontological commitment in first-order logic): The logical symbol '∃x', traditionally called the existential quantifier, but argued here to be better termed the 'particular quantifier' because it does not inherently carry existential commitment.
logical form(Used to characterize logical consequence): The way that a sentence is built up from the logical particles.

2 topics