Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Sharing apprehended content is insufficient to forge the required experiential links between successive acts of sensing
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Two successive extended acts may apprehend overlapping content
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Apprehending the same content does not entail that the acts are phenomenally unified or experientially connected
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Personal Identity
Related propositions within the same area of thought.