Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Showing that inductive inference is a necessary condition... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Showing that inductive inference is a necessary condition of success provides sufficient justification for using inductive inference

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If there is any method that will achieve success, inductive inference is that method
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A course of action that is a necessary condition of achieving a goal is rationally justified even under uncertainty about whether the goal will be achieved
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Showing induction is necessary for success only establishes its indispensability, not its truth-conduciveness or epistemic legitimacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A method can be pragmatically unavoidable yet still fail to confer genuine justification on beliefs formed through it, as Hume's fork implies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Pragmatic vindication conflates instrumental rationality with epistemic rationality, which are distinct normative domains per Reichenbach's own critics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The necessity argument assumes a fixed goal of predictive success, but rival methods like falsificationism or Bayesian updating also claim that same goal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If multiple incompatible inference rules are each necessary for some success-conducive goal, necessity alone cannot adjudicate between them as justified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    If inductive inference can be shown to be a necessary condition of success, then...

    Related

    A course of action that is a necessary condition of achieving a goal is rational...A method can be pragmatically unavoidable yet still fail to confer genuine justi...If inductive inference can be shown to be a necessary condition of success, then...If multiple incompatible inference rules are each necessary for some success-con...
    +4 moreShow less
    If there is any method that will achieve success, inductive inference is that me...Pragmatic vindication conflates instrumental rationality with epistemic rational...Showing induction is necessary for success only establishes its indispensability...The necessity argument assumes a fixed goal of predictive success, but rival met...

    Similar

    If inductive inference can be shown to be a necessary condition of suc...95%If there is any method that will achieve success, inductive inference ...89%The inductive justification shows that inductive inferences are reliab...88%Circular arguments can provide an acceptable justification for inducti...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: induction-problem
    View source passageHide passage
    Reichenbach argued that it was not necessary for the justification of inductive inference to show that its conclusion is true. Rather “the proof of the truth of the conclusion is only a sufficient condition for the justification of induction, not a necessary condition” (Reichenbach 2006: 348). If it could be shown, he says, that inductive inference is a necessary condition of success, then even if we do not know that it will succeed, we still have some reason to follow it. Reichenbach makes a co
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit