Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Sidgwick demonstrated in Methods of Ethics that any conse... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moore's consequentialist thesis that one ought always to perform the best action possible is internally inconsistent with Moore's own moral conservatism.

    Sidgwick demonstrated in Methods of Ethics that any consequentialist theory must maintain extensional equivalence between its criterion of rightness and its decision procedure, or else explicitly bifurcate them as distinct normative levels.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Bifurcate(keeping the criterion and decision procedure distinct)
    To split something into two separate parts or levels.
    Consequentialist theory(as used in ethics)
    A moral theory that judges whether an action is right or wrong entirely based on its consequences or outcomes—for example, whether it produces the most happiness.
    Extensional equivalence(in logic and philosophy of language)
    When two different ways of describing something produce exactly the same results or refer to the same things, even if they look different on the surface.
    Methods of Ethics(the main work being referenced)
    Sidgwick's famous book that explores different ways of thinking about what we morally ought to do—basically a guide to ethical decision-making.
    Normative levels

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (separating theory from practice in ethics)
    Different layers or tiers of moral thinking—like distinguishing between what's ultimately right in theory versus what's practical to follow as a rule.
    Sidgwick
    Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900) was a British philosopher who made important contributions to ethics, particularly by arguing that morality should be based on reason and impartial concern for everyone's well-being rather than just following traditions or religious rules. He is famous for developing "utilitarianism," the idea that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. His work remains influential in moral philosophy and practical ethics today because he thoughtfully addressed how we should balance our own interests with our obligations to others.
    criterion of rightness(Consequentialist theory — distinguished from a decision procedure)
    A standard used to evaluate whether an action or decision procedure is right, which can operate at a higher level than direct moment-to-moment decision-making
    decision procedure(Contrasted with a criterion of rightness in consequentialist theory)
    The method or heuristic an agent directly employs when making real decisions

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Moore's consequentialist thesis that one ought always to perform the best action...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective