Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Sin, as deliberate refusal of this due, constitutes a precise metaphysical debt that disrupts the objective relational order between Creator and creature.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Infinite beings cannot be genuinely wronged by finite beings; any 'debt' to omnipotent perfection is incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Moral obligation requires autonomy and reciprocal relationships; unilateral Creator-creature asymmetry undermines genuine debt.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Metaphysical debt presumes an objective relational order independent of minds, but relationships may be mind-dependent constructs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Creatures have objective duties to their Creator flowing from ontological dependence and causal origination.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Deliberate refusal to fulfill binding duties creates a real relational imbalance requiring restoration or penalty.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Metaphysical debts explain why sin requires atonement rather than mere forgetting or arbitrary absolution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.