Skeptical scenarios (brain-in-vat, evil demon) are logically possible and our actual belief-forming processes cannot distinguish them, so ignoring such alternatives seems to beg the question against skepticism.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Belief-Forming Processes(as used in epistemology): The methods and reasoning someone uses to arrive at their beliefs, like how they gather information or the logic they apply to form conclusions.
Brain-in-vat(as used in skepticism): A thought experiment where you imagine your brain is floating in a tank of chemicals, being fed fake sensations by a computer, so everything you experience might be illusion.
Evil demon(as used in epistemology and skepticism): A thought experiment imagined by philosopher René Descartes: a powerful deceiver who tricks you into experiencing things that don't actually exist, used to question whether you can trust your senses.
Logically possible(modal logic and possibility): Something that doesn't break the rules of logic or create a contradiction, even if it's unlikely to actually happen in real life.

Based on where you are in your exploration