Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Skilled human agents navigate common-sense environments via embodied know-how (Ryle's 'knowing how') rather than exhaustive propositional specification.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Expert agents can articulate principles (physics, technique, strategy) they rely on; this propositional knowledge partly constitutes skill.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Embodied skills require prior propositional learning (rules, warnings, cultural norms) internalized through practice, not replacing it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Ryle's distinction collapses under scrutiny: knowing-how and knowing-that are epistemically interdependent, not categorically separate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Expert cyclists balance without conscious rule-following, suggesting embodied know-how precedes articulate propositional knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Linguistic specification of sensorimotor skills (e.g., 'adjust grip pressure') lags behind actual mastery; explicit rules are post-hoc.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Infants navigate physical spaces effectively before language acquisition, indicating embodied know-how is developmentally foundational.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.