Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Skyrms' 'Evolution of the Social Contract' demonstrates that local interaction structures can sustain greedy strategies independently of Modest presence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Skyrms emphasizes contingency—results depend heavily on initial conditions and parameter values, not universal structural independence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Local interaction structures that sustain greed typically require specific defection costs; this is conditional dependence, not independence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Modest's minimal cooperation can emerge from local structures too; greedy persistence doesn't prove Modest irrelevance to stability mechanisms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Skyrms' spatial models show greedy strategies exploit local clusters where defectors face repeated interaction costs with neighbors.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Modest strategies require global information flow; local structures naturally limit information, enabling greedy survival without Modest presence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Empirical simulations demonstrate greedy strategies persist in lattice networks even when theoretically unstable in well-mixed populations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42