Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Some acts are directly injurious only to the agents thems... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Acts that are publicly indecent may be rightly prohibited by law, even if the same acts performed privately would not be legally interdicted.

    Some acts are directly injurious only to the agents themselves and therefore ought not to be legally interdicted when done privately.

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & Liberty

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment2 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A violation of good manners constitutes an offense against others.Acts that are publicly indecent may be rightly prohibited by law, even if the sa...Offenses against others may be rightly prohibited.When those same acts are done publicly, they constitute a violation of good mann...

    Similar

    Acts that are publicly indecent may be rightly prohibited by law, even...77%Laws should not prohibit actions that citizens might perform inadverte...74%Preventing harm to B does not require showing that A is the agent caus...74%When an individual's private activities cause harm to others, the stat...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Again, there are many acts which, being directly injurious only to the agents themselves, ought not to be legally interdicted, but which, if done publicly, are a violation of good manners and, coming thus within the category of offenses against others, may be rightly prohibited. Of this kind are offenses against decency; on which it is unnecessary to dwell, the rather as they are only connected indirectly with our subject, the objection to publicity being equally strong in the case of many actio

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective