Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Some comparable pairs cannot be judged equally good becau... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There exists a genuine fourth value relation — 'on a par' — distinct from 'better than', 'worse than', and 'equally good'.

    Some comparable pairs cannot be judged equally good because they differ in the respects they display.

    AestheticsModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsModality & Possibility

    Related

    'On a par' is needed to allow for comparability between alternatives that are di...Some pairs of items are comparable even though neither is better than the other.The existing trichotomy of 'better than', 'worse than', and 'equally good' canno...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    There exists a genuine fourth value relation — 'on a par' — distinct from 'bette...

    Similar

    Some pairs of items are comparable even though neither is better than ...87%Two items are 'on a par' when neither is better than the other, their ...78%There exist occasions where comparisons between those goods do need to...77%Anderson's first argument against comparability fails because there ar...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: value-incommensurable
    View source passageHide passage
    A separate proposal for a genuine fourth relationship is Ruth Chang’s argument for “on a par” (Chang 1997; Chang 2002b). Two items are said to be on a par if neither is better than the other, their differences preclude their being equally good, and yet they are comparable. Whereas “roughly equal” is invoked to allow for comparability among alternatives that display the same respects (e.g., literary merit), “on a par” is invoked to allow for comparability between alternatives that are different i

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective