Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Some cultures do not subscribe to universal laws of logic such as non-contradiction and identity, suggesting logic is culturally relative rather than universal.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Lévy-Bruhl himself recanted his 'pre-logical mentality' thesis, acknowledging it misrepresented observed reasoning as logical violation rather than different contextual framing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Anthropological reports of 'non-logical' cultures typically reflect translation failures or ritual/metaphorical speech contexts, not genuine rejection of non-contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even apparent violations of non-contradiction in myth or ceremony are performatively understood as non-literal, preserving the operative logic of the community.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.W.V.O. Quine's principle of charity holds that radical interpretation must attribute logical consistency to speakers, otherwise translation itself becomes impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a culture truly violated non-contradiction, cross-cultural communication and ethnographic documentation of that culture would be systematically incoherent and self-defeating.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The very act of reporting cultural relativism about logic presupposes the universal validity of the logical norms used to formulate and communicate that report.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Tribal or 'primitive' cultures were observed to operate without applying the principles of non-contradiction and identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.These cultures represent a pre-logical stage of thinking.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.