Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Some genuine semantic presuppositions fail the contradict... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Conversational implicatures are cancellable without contradiction, whereas genuine components of 'what is said' cannot be cancelled without falsifying the utterance.

    Some genuine semantic presuppositions fail the contradiction test, suggesting cancellability is neither necessary nor sufficient for distinguishing semantic from pragmatic content.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Contradiction test(as one example of the tests mentioned)
    A specific method for detecting ambiguity by checking whether opposite meanings of a word can both be true at the same time—if they can, the word is ambiguous.
    Pragmatic content(in philosophy of language)
    What someone implies or suggests by saying something, beyond just the literal meaning—like rolling your eyes to suggest you disagree.
    Semantic presupposition(what genuine commitments should be distinguished from)
    Something that a sentence assumes to be true in order to make sense, without actually asserting it as a fact—for example, 'The king is bald' presupposes that a king exists.
    cancellability(Gricean pragmatics)
    The property of an inference being explicitly withdrawn or denied without producing a contradiction

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    necessary and sufficient conditions(in philosophical analysis)
    A 'necessary' condition is something that must be true for something else to happen; a 'sufficient' condition is something that guarantees it will happen. This phrase describes what must be true (and what's enough) for a definition to apply.
    semantic content(Cappelen and Lepore's literalist/minimalist framework)
    Propositions determined solely by conventions of meaning, precisification, disambiguation, and reference fixing — not by pragmatic inference.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Conversational implicatures are cancellable without contradiction, whereas genui...

    Related

    Conversational implicatures are cancellable without contradiction, whereas genui...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective