Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Some mutually consensual associations—such as a violently... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Mill's endorsement of free association among consenting adults is too strong

    Some mutually consensual associations—such as a violently abusive marriage which neither spouse wishes to leave—do not trigger Mill's harm principle because both parties consent

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Mill's endorsement of free association among consenting adults is too strongSuch associations are too morally opprobrious to merit protection from third-par...Therefore, mutual consent alone is insufficient to justify protection of an asso...

    Similar

    A consensual, mutually beneficial interaction cannot be worse than the...76%Therefore, mutual consent alone is insufficient to justify protection ...75%Mill's harm principle is fundamentally concerned with non-consensual h...74%The harm principle targets only non-consensual harms (volenti principl...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: freedom-association
    View source passageHide passage
    Mill’s strong endorsement of associative freedom leaves many questions unanswered since it pertains only to consenting adults acting with full information. As §1 makes clear, many of our core associations have a different structure, as we could not consent to them. Especially in early childhood, we do not choose, though we often come to embrace, our familial arrangements. Also, many of our closest, familial associations can produce some often-unintended harm to others, since these associations

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective