Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Some powers are constitutively one-directional: the power to detonate a bomb, once exercised, forecloses the power not to have detonated it.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The power not to detonate remains real beforehand; that it ceases after detonation reflects temporal facts, not power constitutively.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
All powers become unexercisable after their exercise (you lack the power to press a button twice in one moment), making this unremarkable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Calling powers 'one-directional' conflates metaphysical directedness with mere temporal asymmetry in outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Exercises of power that produce irreversible physical states (detonation) necessarily eliminate counterfactual alternatives.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The ability to reverse or undo an action is conceptually distinct from and required for the power to avoid that action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Powers grounded in contingent future possibilities differ fundamentally from powers grounded in accomplished facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42