Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Some scientific knowledge, such as the fact that the sum ... — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Empiricist methodology is problematic because it renders all knowledge probabilistic and a posteriori, which is insufficient to account for certain scientific knowledge.

    Some scientific knowledge, such as the fact that the sum of the angles of a Euclidean triangle is 180 degrees, is known with certainty.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    2 linked

    Related

    Empiricist methodology is problematic because it renders all knowledge probabili...Probabilistic, a posteriori knowledge cannot ground certain scientific knowledge...Under empiricism, all knowledge is derived from combinations of ideas derived fr...

    Similar

    Triangularity is known perfectly because it does not depend on the exi...76%Both the real possibility of God and the angle-sum property of triangl...75%To know a geometric truth (e.g., that an isosceles triangle has two eq...74%Aristotle held that scientific knowledge is knowledge of necessary tru...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: information
    View source passageHide passage
    The empiricists methodology is not without problems. The biggest issue is that all knowledge becomes probabilistic and a posteriori. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) was one of the first to point out that the human mind has a grasp of the meta-concepts of space, time and causality that itself can never be understood as the result of a mere combination of “ideas”. What is more, these intuitions allow us to formulate scientific insights with certainty: i.e., the fact that the sum of the angles of a trian

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective