Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Some theological traditions, including occasionalism (Malebranche) and divine conservationism, hold that God is the proximate cause of all natural events.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If God is the proximate cause of all events including human actions, moral responsibility and desert become philosophically incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The occasionalist position makes God causally responsible for all evils, moral wrongs, and suffering in creation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Empirical science successfully explains natural events through secondary causes without invoking God for each occurrence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If God's power is infinite and omnipotent, He cannot be genuinely limited by independent causal powers in creation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Continuous divine conservation of being requires active divine involvement in sustaining each moment of existence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Occasionalism elegantly solves the mind-body interaction problem by making God the sole bridge between mental and physical.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.