Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Spatio-temporal relations are the privileged means by which objects not directly perceived are related to demonstratively identified objects.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Causal relations, not spatio-temporal ones, are the fundamental basis by which we identify and refer to unperceived objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Kripke and Devitt demonstrate that reference chains are sustained by causal-historical links independent of any spatio-temporal mapping.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A causal theory of reference can account for identification of abstract-like entities and theoretical posits where spatio-temporal location is indeterminate or undefined.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Functional and inferential roles within a conceptual scheme can uniquely identify objects without privileging spatio-temporal relations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Quine's ontological relativity shows that object identification is relative to a background theory, not anchored to a privileged spatio-temporal framework.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Sally can identify objects she has not perceived by relating them to demonstratively identified objects via unique relations those objects bear to the identified stock.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Strawson argues, following Kant, that spatio-temporal relations are the privileged set of relations enabling identification of particulars.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.