Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Speusippus's apophatic move thus severs the causal-genera... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The One is not a being

    Speusippus's apophatic move thus severs the causal-generative link the One is invoked to explain, making the theory explanatorily vacuous rather than admirably transcendent.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If the One is utterly transcendent and unknowable, positing it as a causal explanation merely relocates mystery rather than resolving it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Explanatory theories require intelligible mechanisms; apophatic negation of all predicates from the One blocks any such mechanism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Platonist metaphysics demands that first principles illuminate derivative reality; radical apophaticism leaves derivation unintelligible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Explanatory vacuity and transcendence are not mutually exclusive; some ultimate principles may require apophatic description for coherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The One's causal role may work through emanation or overflow rather than efficient causation, evading the traditional causality requirement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Demanding positive predicates for explanatory adequacy may itself rest on unexamined assumptions about causality's rational intelligibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Against an aspect of God1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Demanding positive predicates for explanatory adequacy may itself rest on unexam...Explanatory theories require intelligible mechanisms; apophatic negation of all ...Explanatory vacuity and transcendence are not mutually exclusive; some ultimate ...If the One is utterly transcendent and unknowable, positing it as a causal expla...
    +3 moreShow less
    Platonist metaphysics demands that first principles illuminate derivative realit...The One is not a beingThe One's causal role may work through emanation or overflow rather than efficie...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit