Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Spinoza's own distinction between natura naturans and natura naturata implies Substance itself follows from nothing external, breaking the universality of the following-from relation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The 'following-from' relation in Spinoza is univocal: all things follow from Substance's nature by logical necessity, including the natura naturans/naturata distinction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Substance not following from anything external doesn't break the following-from relation—it instantiates it perfectly as self-determining (causa sui).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates 'following from nothing external' with 'breaking universality' when they may describe the same logical necessity operating at all levels.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Natura naturans (nature naturing) is self-causing; natura naturata (nature natured) derives from it, creating an asymmetry in dependence relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If Substance followed from something external, it would depend on that external thing, contradicting its status as ultimate reality and self-cause.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction itself presupposes that not all relations work identically—Substance's self-necessity differs from derivative modes' dependence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.