Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Strawson's reactive attitudes account grounds responsibility in susceptibility to practices of holding responsible, not in prior moral receptivity.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Susceptibility to practices alone cannot distinguish justified from unjustified blame—a cult can hold members responsible unfairly.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If responsibility just tracks what practices we engage in, then changing practices could make the innocent responsible and guilty free.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The account assumes reactive attitudes are appropriate responses, but this requires prior standards of moral appropriateness to evaluate them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Responsibility practices (blame, resentment, gratitude) are universal social phenomena that predate moral theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Grounding responsibility in susceptibility to these practices avoids circular reasoning about prior moral facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This account explains why we hold responsible those who lack explicit moral understanding but participate in social relationships.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.