Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Strawson's reactive attitudes are grounded in the demand ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A judgment with the same content as the cognitive element of a blaming emotion could itself constitute an instance of blame.

    Strawson's reactive attitudes are grounded in the demand for goodwill, meaning the cognitive recognition of ill will is what triggers the reactive stance, not the emotion independently.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cognitive recognition(as how we detect someone's ill will toward us)
    The act of consciously understanding or identifying something through thought, rather than just feeling it emotionally.
    Ill will(as a motivation behind behavior)
    A hostile or mean-spirited intention toward someone; wanting to harm or disrespect them.
    Reactive stance(as the emotional response that gets triggered)
    The position or attitude we take when we respond emotionally to someone based on how they've treated us.
    Strawson
    # Strawson Peter Strawson was a 20th-century British philosopher best known for challenging the traditional view that all meaningful statements must be either true or false. He argued that some statements—like "The present King of France is bald"—are neither true nor false because they fail to properly refer to anything that exists. His work fundamentally changed how philosophers think about language, meaning, and logic.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    goodwill(describing what the trusted person might have)
    A genuine desire to help or treat someone well; having friendly or positive intentions toward another person.
    reactive attitudes(Blame is given as the paradigm case of a reactive attitude)
    Attitudes that agents have towards other agents in response to those agents' behavior

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    A judgment with the same content as the cognitive element of a blaming emotion c...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective