Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Strawson's reactive attitudes framework shows blame is co... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The characteristic features of Scanlon's interpretation of blame are unnecessary.

    Strawson's reactive attitudes framework shows blame is constituted by feelings like resentment and indignation, not relational revision intentions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Blame persists even when we abandon relational intentions, as when we resent historical figures we'll never interact with again.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reactive attitudes like resentment have phenomenological priority—they arise spontaneously before deliberate relational choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.People with psychopathy can form relational intentions to modify behavior without experiencing the resentment constitutive of blame.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Blame judgments can be made while explicitly suppressing resentment, suggesting feelings are not constitutive but merely typical accompaniments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Blame requires accountability standards independent of any individual's emotional states; resentment varies by temperament, not blameworthiness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Parents blame children while also intending relational revision; Strawson conflates the feeling with distinct communicative and corrective aims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Blame judgments can be made while explicitly suppressing resentment, suggesting ...Blame persists even when we abandon relational intentions, as when we resent his...Blame requires accountability standards independent of any individual's emotiona...Parents blame children while also intending relational revision; Strawson confla...
    +3 moreShow less
    People with psychopathy can form relational intentions to modify behavior withou...Reactive attitudes like resentment have phenomenological priority—they arise spo...The characteristic features of Scanlon's interpretation of blame are unnecessary...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit