Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Strawson's transcendental argument can only establish tha... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Strawson's transcendental argument in The Bounds of Sense concludes only about how experience must be conceptualized, not about how a mind-independent world must be.

    Strawson's transcendental argument can only establish that experience must be conceptualized in a way that allows the subject to distinguish between an objective world and her subjective path through it.

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Key Terms

    Conceptualized(describes how experience must be organized)
    Organized and understood through concepts or mental categories; basically, how we think about and make sense of things using our minds.
    Strawson
    # Strawson Peter Strawson was a 20th-century British philosopher best known for challenging the traditional view that all meaningful statements must be either true or false. He argued that some statements—like "The present King of France is bald"—are neither true nor false because they fail to properly refer to anything that exists. His work fundamentally changed how philosophers think about language, meaning, and logic.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Subjective path(the other side of the distinction—your own inner experience contrasted with the objective world)
    Your personal, individual experience and perspective—how things appear to you specifically, including your thoughts, feelings, and point of view.
    objective world(Kant's account of the conditions of self-consciousness)
    A world distinct from one's subjective representations — that is, distinct from one's thoughts about and sensations of that world.
    transcendental argument(Kant's method for establishing a priori knowledge of the categories)
    An argument that proceeds by identifying the necessary preconditions for the possibility of experience

    Related

    A conclusion about how experience must be conceptualized is not a conclusion abo...Strawson's transcendental argument in The Bounds of Sense concludes only about h...

    Similar

    Strawson's transcendental argument in The Bounds of Sense concludes on...91%Stroud's criticism shows that transcendental arguments cannot move fro...86%The subject must conceptualize her experience so as to feature a disti...85%Strawson's argument in The Bounds of Sense only establishes how experi...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    Although Strawson’s transcendental argument in The Bounds of Sense is not a specific target in Stroud’s (1968), Anthony Brueckner suggests that it is susceptible to the line of criticism that Stroud develops (Brueckner 1983: 557–8). For, arguably, Strawson can only conclude that experience must be conceptualized in a certain way, such as to allow the subject to make the distinction between an objective world and her subjective path through it. This is not a conclusion about how a mind-independen

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective