Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Stroud holds that claiming how the world must be as a con... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Stroud's position is inconsistent, because he cannot coherently permit modal claims within thought while prohibiting modal claims between thought and the world without providing a principled account of the asymmetry.

    Stroud holds that claiming how the world must be as a condition for our thought or experience is inherently problematic.

    Modality & PossibilitySkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismModality & Possibility

    Related

    If modal connections are viable between psychological facts, then the same stand...No principled account is provided by Stroud for why modal connections are less p...Stroud does not hold that claiming one aspect of thought or experience is a nece...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Stroud himself exploits intra-thought necessary connection claims in his own arg...
    +1 moreShow less
    Stroud's position is inconsistent, because he cannot coherently permit modal cla...

    Similar

    Stroud does not hold that claiming one aspect of thought or experience...86%We can argue that the world itself must be a certain way to fit the co...83%Transcendental arguments that assert non-psychological facts about the...77%Strawson's argument in The Bounds of Sense only establishes how experi...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transcendental-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    Perhaps one difficulty that can be raised for Stroud, is that while he thinks there is something inherently problematic in making a claim about how the world must be as a condition for our thought or experience, he does not think that there is anything particularly problematic about claiming that our thought or experience is a necessary condition for some other aspect of our thought or experience – indeed, he exploits such claims himself in his own arguments against the skeptic (cf. Stroud 1994

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective