Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Structural injustice theorists (Young, Anderson) argue th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A complete ethics of risk must distinguish between intentional and unintentional risk exposure, and between voluntary risk-taking, accepted imposed risks, and non-accepted imposed risks.

    Structural injustice theorists (Young, Anderson) argue that focusing on individual intent obscures systemic risk distributions imposed on marginalized groups without meaningful consent.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Anderson (in this context)(as a theorist referenced alongside Young)
    Likely Elizabeth Anderson, a contemporary philosopher who works on issues of equality and justice, including how unfair systems affect marginalized groups.
    Individual intent(as what the statement says we shouldn't focus on)
    A person's conscious purpose or motivation for their actions—for example, whether someone deliberately tried to discriminate.
    Marginalized groups(as used in social and political philosophy)
    Communities or populations that are pushed to the edges of society and have less power and influence in decisions, often due to discrimination or historical disadvantage.
    Meaningful consent(as what's absent when injustice is imposed on groups)
    Genuine, informed agreement where someone truly understands what they're agreeing to and has real freedom to refuse—not just going along because they have no choice.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Risk distribution(as describing how marginalized groups are affected)
    How chances of harm, danger, or negative outcomes are spread across different groups in society—like some groups facing higher risks of poverty, illness, or violence.
    Systemic
    # Systemic Systemic means something that affects or involves an entire system rather than just individual parts. For example, systemic racism isn't just about individual prejudiced people, but about how discrimination is built into institutions, laws, and social structures as a whole. When a problem is systemic, it requires changes to the whole system to fix it, not just addressing isolated incidents.
    Young, Iris Marion(as referenced by 'Young's structural criteria')
    An influential American political philosopher who developed influential theories about justice, oppression, and structural inequality in society.
    structural injustice(Powers and Faden 2019)
    A condition characterized by unfair patterns of disadvantage, unfair power relations, deprivations in core elements of well-being, and human rights violations, where these elements are mutually reinforcing.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    A complete ethics of risk must distinguish between intentional and unintentional...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective