Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Such wide-reaching claims must rely on a simplistic conce... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Arguments that justify terrorist violence by denying the innocence of victims prove too much.

    Such wide-reaching claims must rely on a simplistic conception of collective responsibility.

    Justice & PunishmentMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityJustice & Punishment

    Related

    Arguments that justify terrorist violence by denying the innocence of victims pr...If such arguments succeed, the act in question would no longer count as terroris...Showing that randomly targeted people are not innocent requires a very wide-reac...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Forward-looking collective responsibility is not morally salient prima...79%Forward-looking collective responsibility is morally salient because i...78%Backward-looking collective responsibility is morally salient because ...78%Despite the non-distributional character of collective responsibility,...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: terrorism
    View source passageHide passage
    If the former line of argument is successful, will it prove too much? In showing that an instance of violence was justified because those targeted were not really innocent, we will have shown that the act or campaign of violence at issue was actually not a case of terrorism. This may be merely a matter of semantics. There is a much more damaging objection. A terrorist act is characteristically the killing or injuring of a random collection of people who happen to be in a certain place at a certa

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective