Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Suits and Rawls both ground game-playing in the voluntary acceptance of rules as demonstrated through action, not through unexpressed dispositions.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Coerced or habitual rule-following demonstrates action without voluntary acceptance, undermining the equation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Rawls' veil of ignorance involves hypothetical consent, not actual action, contradicting the claim's strictness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Players may possess genuine dispositions to accept rules that remain undemonstrated due to circumstance or shyness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Observable rule-following behavior is epistemically more reliable than inferring unstated dispositions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Voluntary acceptance through action creates enforceable obligations that disposition alone cannot establish.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Both philosophers emphasize consent as foundational to legitimacy, making behavior the operative indicator.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.