Supervaluationism denies the induction step by making 'there exists a last child' neither true nor false, yet still cannot assign a determinate boundary under any admissible precisification.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
A theory of vagueness on which semantic indecision is intentional and functional: speakers fill in the meanings of terms incrementally in light of new information and interests rather than fixing full definitions prematurely.