Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Supplementing with a theoretical justification tied to mo... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The notion of retributive justice would be on sounder footing if the first justificatory strategy were supplemented by a theoretical justification for punitive hard treatment tied to a more general set of principles of justice.

    Supplementing with a theoretical justification tied to more general principles of justice would help dispel doubts that retributive intuitions are the crabbed judgments of a squinty, vengeful, or cruel soul.

    Justice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & Punishment

    Key Terms

    Retributive(as used in theories of punishment)
    Based on the idea that punishment should be given simply because someone deserves it for doing wrong, like 'an eye for an eye.'
    Retributive intuitions(ethics)
    Our gut feeling that wrongdoers should be punished simply because they did something bad, without needing another reason.
    Theoretical justification(as used in epistemology and philosophy of law)
    A logical explanation or argument that provides deep, foundational reasons for why something should be accepted as true or valid.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    principles of justice(Rawls's justice as fairness)
    Principles guaranteeing that, regardless of social position, one has the rights and resources needed to maintain valued commitments, exercise rational and moral deliberation, and sustain self-respect as an equal citizen.

    Related

    The first justificatory strategy for retributive justice does not obviously succ...The notion of retributive justice would be on sounder footing if the first justi...

    Similar

    The notion of retributive justice would be on sounder footing if the f...84%Only by being grounded in or connected to other deeply held moral prin...82%Any quest for the justification of retributive justice must start with...81%Utilitarian theory need not mirror common intuitions about justice exa...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: justice-retributive
    View source passageHide passage
    The point is not to say that this first justificatory strategy fails. It is to say that it does not obviously succeed. The notion of retributive justice would be on sounder footing if this justification were supplemented by a theoretical justification for punitive hard treatment that ties it to a more general set of principles of justice. Doing so would help dispel doubts that retributive intuitions are the crabbed judgments of a squinty, vengeful, or cruel soul.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective