Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Sweeping away established institutions in favor of abstract rights demonstrates a crass disregard for human nature and history
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Abstract rules or rights uninformed by the customs and culture of a people ignore national character
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Human nature and history are the most obvious facts that any sound political programme must reckon with
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Prudence, not theoretical purity, is the proper guide for political action
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
2 perspectives
Reason against 1 of 2
?
1.
Hegel's Phenomenology demonstrates that rational freedom must be actualized through historically developed institutions, not imposed abstractly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Rights divorced from Sittlichkeit—the concrete ethical life of family, civil society, and state—produce empty formalism that cannot bind persons.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The French Revolutionary Terror confirms empirically that abstract universalism, absent mediating institutions, collapses into tyranny.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason against 2 of 2
?
1.
Burke's Reflections establishes that inherited institutions encode accumulated practical wisdom no single generation can replicate through reason alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Oakeshott's distinction between rationalist politics and the 'pursuit of intimations' shows that traditions contain inarticulate knowledge resistant to codification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.