Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Swinburne's soul-making theodicy grounds this: a world with genuine moral development is better than one without, and such development metaphysically requires the possibility of suffering.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.An omnipotent God could grant moral understanding and virtue without requiring suffering as a causal mechanism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Extreme suffering (childhood cancer, torture) causally outpaces any plausible moral development it could enable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The theodicy proves too much: it would justify any amount of suffering if it marginally increases moral development.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral virtue requires genuine choice between good and evil; without real temptation or hardship, choice lacks meaningful content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Character development through overcoming adversity produces deeper, more resilient moral understanding than innate virtue.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A world enabling agents to achieve moral growth through struggle is objectively better than one denying such achievement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.