Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Swinburne's theory jeopardizes the personhood of each mem... — Carmelics
    Home/Trinity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Swinburne's theory of the Trinity should be rejected or is seriously problematic.

    Swinburne's theory jeopardizes the personhood of each member of the Trinity.

    Trinity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Trinity

    Related

    Swinburne's theory allows the possibility of more than one divine being.Swinburne's theory carries the serious price of allowing that a divine being may...Swinburne's theory entails serious inequalities of power among the Three.Swinburne's theory of the Trinity should be rejected or is seriously problematic...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Swinburne's theory of the Trinity should be rejected or is seriously p...82%Swinburne's theory entails serious inequalities of power among the Thr...78%Hasker's theory is problematic because the divine nature/soul, which i...78%Swinburne's theory allows the possibility of more than one divine bein...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: trinity
    View source passageHide passage
    Moreover, Swinburne’s theory entails serious inequalities of power among the Three, jeopardizes the personhood of each, and carries the serious price of allowing (contrary to most theists) that a divine being may be created, and the possibility of more than one divine being (Leftow 1999, 236–40).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective