Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    T.M. Scanlon grounds interpersonal distributive principle... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Utilitarianism is justified in ignoring interpersonal distributive principles grounded in the distinctness of persons.

    T.M. Scanlon grounds interpersonal distributive principles in the practice of justification to individuals, which is independent of deep metaphysical facts about personal identity.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Justification to individuals(the foundation Scanlon uses for his distributive principles)
    The practice of explaining and defending decisions or rules directly to the people affected by them, so they can understand why something is fair or reasonable.
    Metaphysical facts(as what Strawson argues is NOT necessary for moral responsibility)
    Deep truths about the nature of reality itself—things like whether free will exists or whether the future is determined.
    T.M. Scanlon(defender of non-naturalist cognitivism)
    A contemporary American philosopher who defends the idea that moral claims are real truths based on contractualist reasoning (what rational people could agree to).
    distributive principles(as used in ethics and political philosophy)
    Rules about how to fairly spread out or divide something (like happiness, pain, or resources) among different people or groups.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    personal identity(Philosophy of personal identity)
    The relation of sameness holding between a person existing at one time and something existing at another time, analyzed here in terms of psychological continuity

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Utilitarianism is justified in ignoring interpersonal distributive principles gr...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective