Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Taking intuitions as a starting point is compatible with ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Wakefield's appeal to folk intuitions to derive necessary and sufficient conditions for mental disorder does not establish that those intuitions should be hegemonic over scientific inquiry.

    Taking intuitions as a starting point is compatible with allowing science to revise or go beyond those intuitions.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    3 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    1 linked
    Bioethics1 linked

    Related

    There is a meaningful distinction between using intuitions as an initial guide a...Wakefield's appeal to folk intuitions to derive necessary and sufficient conditi...

    Similar

    Empirical inquiry into the nature of intuitions is a necessary first s...82%Rational intuition is a candidate for a basic source of evidence, subj...81%There is a meaningful distinction between using intuitions as an initi...81%Linguistic intuitions are metalinguistic reports of elicited judgments...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: health-disease
    View source passageHide passage
    Objections to an evolutionary notion of medical malfunction do not show that there is anything wrong with the general idea of basing judgments of health and disease on a scientifically established picture of the normal functional decomposition of human beings. However, on this account, it becomes harder to retain the conservative project that looks for the natural phenomena that fall under, and are therefore constrained by, our folk concepts of health and disease. Wakefield, for instance, thinks

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective