Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Temporal indexing of divine acts is incompatible with strict timelessness but compatible with a weaker reading of simplicity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If God truly indexes acts to times, God possesses temporal properties, which contradicts even weaker readings of divine simplicity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Relational properties grounding temporal indexing still introduce composition and dependency, violating the core commitments of simplicity doctrine.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Strict timelessness requires God to lack temporal properties entirely, making temporal indexing (e.g., 'God acts at t') literally nonsensical.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Weaker simplicity permits God's identity to remain unified while allowing relational properties like 'creating the world at time t'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical theology struggles reconciling divine immutability with creation unless acts are indexed to times without temporal succession in God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.