Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    That a person may be criticized in many ways for holding ... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Ney's two responses do not adequately address the objection that a person holding the described attitude in the imagined situation is not correctly described as a physicalist.

    That a person may be criticized in many ways for holding an attitude does not establish that the attitude is sufficient for physicalism.

    Consciousness & MindMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    A person who holds the attitude Ney describes in the imagined situation is not c...Ney's two responses do not adequately address the objection that a person holdin...The fact that holding a particular attitude is not sufficient for being a physic...

    Similar

    It is reasonable to criticize people who hold the attitude Ney identif...91%A person who holds the attitude Ney describes in the imagined situatio...86%Ney's two responses do not adequately address the objection that a per...86%The fact that holding a particular attitude is not sufficient for bein...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: physicalism
    View source passageHide passage
    In response, Ney agrees that this is a possibility but points out, first, it would still be reasonable to criticize the people who hold the attitude – for example, on the grounds that those who hold a different attitude might have arrived at correct ontology more quickly – and, second, that it doesn’t follow that the attitude definitive of physicalism is identical to the attitude definitive of dualism. (The ideas underlying this second point are (a) if one adopts the attitudinal view about physi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective