Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The a priori principle that God would never deceive us is... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The a priori principle that God would never deceive us is not itself a secure foundation against skepticism

    Divine AttributesSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.One could doubt whether the principle that God would never deceive us is itself certain
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A foundation used to rebut the skeptic must itself be beyond doubt
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesSkepticism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Truth & Knowledge
    1 linked

    Related

    A foundation used to rebut the skeptic must itself be beyond doubtOne could doubt whether the principle that God would never deceive us is itself ...

    Similar

    One could doubt whether the principle that God would never deceive us ...84%Moral skepticism is precluded by the fact that we will and act.81%Applying the principle that justified belief requires ruling out all c...81%Global skepticism is treated as a merely theoretical challenge that do...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: crathorn
    View source passageHide passage
    Crathorn endeavored elsewhere to gather at least a few certitudes, since one could doubt whether the a priori principle that God would never deceive us is itself certain. To rebut the skeptic, he turns back to Augustine’s version of the cogito-argument to prove that we can at least be certain of our own mental activity, for if one were to doubt a proposition such as ‘I am’, it would follow that he exists, since he who does not exist does not doubt. Hence, no one can be in doubt concerning the pr
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit