Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The absence of knowledge does not entail conscious ignorance of that absence
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Metacognitive awareness is a constitutive feature of rational minds, not an optional addition to their epistemic states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A mind capable of knowledge-acts is thereby capable of registering their absence as a felt privation, not mere non-occurrence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Heytesbury's separation of absence-of-knowledge from conscious ignorance conflates the logical and phenomenological dimensions of epistemic states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Socratic ignorance, as theorized from the Meno onward, treats the awareness of not-knowing as itself a structured cognitive achievement requiring conscious attention.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If knowledge requires actively apprehending a fact, then the disposition to seek knowledge presupposes some conscious registration of its current absence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Knowledge is an evidence-based act of considering something and apprehending its factuality
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The absence of such an act is not itself a conscious state of ignorance
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.