Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The acceptability of circular reasoning must be judged by an external standard, or the criterion of acceptability becomes vacuous.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.All external standards ultimately rest on unprovable foundations; demanding external criteria simply postpones rather than solves the problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some systems (e.g., formal logic) are self-validating through coherence; internal consistency can constitute acceptability without external judgment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim itself is circular: it assumes an external standard exists to judge what external standards are acceptable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Self-referential standards cannot evaluate themselves without assuming their own validity, creating infinite regress.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without external criteria, any circular argument appears valid to its own internal logic, making all reasoning equally justified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Mathematics and science rely on external verification methods precisely because internal consistency alone proved insufficient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.