Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The 'ad hoc sortal' objection presupposes that sortals mu... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The formal proof that there is no such thing as relative identity requires that there are no ad hoc sortals.

    The 'ad hoc sortal' objection presupposes that sortals must be antecedently fixed, but Wiggins's sortal essentialism shows sortals are grounded in natural kinds, not logical convenience.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Ad hoc(general philosophy (criticism of arguments))
    A solution or explanation created just to fix one specific problem, rather than being part of a coherent overall theory.
    Logical convenience(as the alternative to natural kinds)
    A way of organizing or categorizing things simply because it's useful or practical for us, without any real basis in how nature is actually structured.
    Sortal essentialism(as Wiggins's philosophical position)
    The view that what makes something belong to a particular category (like 'dog' or 'gold') is something deep and unchangeable about its nature, not just an arbitrary human decision.
    Sortals must be antecedently fixed(as the assumption the objection relies on)
    The idea that the categories we use to sort things must be decided beforehand, based on logical rules we choose, rather than discovered from nature itself.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Wiggins(as a reference to a specific philosopher's technical framework)
    David Wiggins is a British philosopher who developed important theories about identity—how we determine what makes something the same thing over time, like what makes you still 'you' even though your body changes.
    grounded in(whether distinctness or identity is explained by intrinsic features)
    To be explained by or to have its reason or basis in something else—like how a tree being wet is grounded in (explained by) recent rain.
    natural kinds(Water is offered as a paradigm example of a natural kind individuated by microstructure)
    Categories of things in nature that share an essential microstructure, used to ground essentialism about species and substances
    sortal(Used to ground identity claims between objects picked out by singular terms)
    A kind or category (G) that an object falls under, which supports identity and counting claims of the form 'the same G as'

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    The formal proof that there is no such thing as relative identity requires that ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective